A new voice in America’s battle against political corruption
Joe Angione is a former columnist for The Villages Daily Sun, and can be reached by email by clicking HERE
Joe Angione Live Interview on Freedom in America
Latest Edition 2/20/17
Two powerful ways Trump’s ban can survive the Ninth Circuit Court
Those of us who are intelligent enough, and have a patriot’s love of America, are outraged by the Ninth Circuit Court’s rejection of president Trump’s “travel ban” on migrants from Jihadi-controlled countries. Our righteous anger soars even higher because the Ninth Circuit is ready to expose us to the same appalling crime wave that unvetted refugees from the Middle East and North Africa have unleashed on the people of Western Europe.
If you aren’t aware of Muslim refugees’ continuous bloody assaults on citizens of nearly every European nation, please click on gatestoneinstitute. It offers a news update daily on the horrors of the Muslim immigration jihad that now terrorizes Europe thanks to the cowardly morons who now lead the European Union.
This issue of The Conservative Way also includes an article describing some examples of the barbarous attacks young Muslim men are inflicting on virtually any non-Muslim they care to abuse in cities and towns all across the continent.
At any cost, we American patriots must never allow this to happen here in the United States. And we don’t have to…take heart…rejoice…there are at least two ways President Trump can negate the terrible consequences of the Ninth Circuit…and both are inherently lawful and vital to our survival.
One: Ignore an unconstitutional court decision. President Trump has the right, the power and the protection in law to do this. The Canada Free Press is a publication that is spearheading the truth that Trump can thumb his nose at the Ninth Circuit’s decision. (The motto of this publication should make all American patriots swell with pride. It believes that Canada cannot exist without a strong America.)
The publication argues that Americans should not accept judicial “supremacy.” Thomas Jefferson warned that, if we accepted the judiciary as supreme among the three branches of our federal government, we would be contributing to the death of our founding document, the U.S. Constitution.
The power of American courts over matters that pertain to the executive branch is largely an illusion…and the Constitution was written to ensure that our courts are basically impotent in this regard. The judiciary does not have the “power” to rule on law and have its decisions constrain the activities of the other two branches simply because it’s not given that power by anything written in the U.S. Constitution.
Jefferson wrote in 1820 that “to consider judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy.” We are a republic and must steadfastly guard against and prevent any group from usurping the power of the people.
The judiciary enjoys its power at the “pleasure of the executive branch.” President Andrew Jackson made that clear when, in 1832, after the Supreme Court handed down a decision in a case involving native Americans in Georgia that outraged Jackson, he responded: “The courts have made their decision; now let them enforce it.” There was no enforcement possible because the Court lacks the military power to do it.
As nearly two centuries have passed since Jackson’s presidency, and no other president has had the character and the courage to openly defy a Supreme Court ruling, “the judiciary has become increasingly brazen. It now issues rulings that are more and more distant from the Constitution.” This must be stopped. Donald Trump must understand that the rulebook on what the judiciary can and cannot do is the U.S. Constitution.
Article III grants Congress the power to limit the jurisdiction of federal courts below the Supreme Court and also disallow the appellate jurisdiction of the high court.
The Canada Free Press noted that, in fact, “Congress could simply have prevented federal courts below the SCOTUS [level] from ruling on immigration (and other issues) to begin with… and [have disallowed] the SCOTUS from reviewing lower-court decisions on those issues.”
What’s more, Article III of the Constitution empowers Congress to eliminate any and every federal court, except for the Supreme Court. And so, Congress could have made the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit disappear long ago. We can never have a true balance of power among the three branches, if Congress and the president will not exercise the power authorized to them by the Constitution. Of the two, Congress has been the most remiss in not using its power.
It’s been said that, if President Trump ignores the Ninth Circuit, it would ignite violent demonstrations from coast to coast that would become a national crisis. But such a crisis is already in the making. When the judiciary is continually trampling on the prerogatives of the other branches of government, violating the Constitution, and threatening the safety of the nation by permitting violence in the streets, we have crossed over the “doorstep” of massive civil unrest.
Two: Temporarily set the travel ban aside. At this time, and until Trump can get Judge Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination approved by the Senate, it would be foolhardy to pursue reinstating his travel ban or even attempt to rewrite it in narrower, more specific terms. Right now, he can achieve nothing regarding the ban through a liberal circuit court determined to block him in every way. But he can wait out Gorsuch’s approval while at the same time initiating a preliminary version of “extreme vetting” of refugees to be conducted by Homeland Security and State Department agents responsible for this task.
The objective of Trump’s travel ban is to gain time to produce a foolproof vetting process. But he isn’t restricted by any court from quickly toughening up the current process to the extent that it would slow down admission of refugees to a “trickle.” Perhaps admissions could be limited to just a few hundred for the entire year, accepting only those rare applicants who have all the necessary documentation to establish their true identity and their desire to become peaceful, productive U.S. residents. This could be accomplished “behind the scenes” via a confidential order (protected from leaks) to vetting agents from the desks of Homeland Security Director, General Kelly, and Secretary of State, Tillerson.
Should any liberal-activist judge attempt to block such stepped-up vetting, it would be more than sufficient justification for Trump to defy this obstruction by ignoring it as “null and void, which is his right to do as derived from the U.S. Constitution as well as statutorily from U.S. law: 8 US Code 1182 as contained in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.
Europe will be a Muslim caliphate by the end of this century
More than a decade ago historian, Bernard Lewis, warned that if current migration trends continue, Europe will be Islamic [a Sharia-dominated] caliphate by the end of the 21st century. The Gatestone Institute, that tracks the Islamification of Europe, believes the political elites in every European Union nation are at the vanguard of making that prediction come true. They are achieving this through their suicidal open-borders policy, by exonerating Muslim criminals, and suppressing news of their thousands upon thousands of crimes committed against non-Muslim Europeans, particularly children.
What does this portend for the United States? Nothing short of a similar caliphate taking complete control of America not long after it happens in Europe. Our political parties, particularly Democrats, have flirted with the open-border concept for more than a decade. It has only been thanks to the staunch resistance of ordinary, traditional American voters--like those who overwhelmingly supported Donald Trump--that U.S. citizens have not been stripped of their right to preserve America for Americans.
Today, many of our leaders want to allow anyone to enter our country, to gain legal residency, regardless of whether they intend to harm us, destroy our traditions, replace our culture, trample our religious freedom or silence our right to speak out against the evils they bring with them. Why would our leaders do such a terrible thing? Because they’re politicians first and servants of the American people last. More immigrants quickly admitted means more votes for their benefactors. And these benefactors will sell American citizens out for every vote they can get.
Immigrants entering Europe are mainly Muslim…mainly male…mainly young. For one reason or another, many resort to lives of crime. Here’s some proof of how Muslim migrant criminals are making life for their Europeans hosts a living nightmare? These reports published in just the last two months by the Gatestone Institute and its companion website, Gatestone Europe will chill you to the bone:
Germany: Muslim sex crimes are soaring in Germany. According to the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt, BKA), in 2013, migrants committed 599 sex crimes, or an average of two a day. In 2014, migrants committed 949 sex crimes, or around three per day. In 2015, migrants committed 1,683 sex crimes, or around five per day. During the first three quarters of 2016, migrants committed 2,790 sex crimes, or around ten per day.
In fact, the actual number of migrant-related sex crimes in Germany is at least two or three times higher than the official number. For example, only 10% of the sex crimes committed in Germany appear in the official statistics, according to André Schulz, head of the Criminal Police Association (Bund Deutscher Kriminalbeamter, BDK).
Germany's radical Muslim future is frightening. Critics of Germany's open-door immigration policy are warning that the recent surge in Germany's Muslim population — which surpassed six million in 2016 for the first time — has already changed the face of the country forever.
According to a leaked German intelligence document: The country is importing Islamic extremism. This includes Arab anti-Semitism, the national and ethnic conflicts of other countries, as well as a different understanding of society and law. German security agencies are unable to deal with these imported security problems, and the resulting reactions from the German population.
France: An “inquisition” has been set in motion in France. It seeks to end all speech that is critical of the extremes exhibited by the nation’s Muslim population that now has reached more than 6.5 million, ten percent of its total population. Complaints are filed against everyone not saying that Muslims are actually the main victim of racism in France, when it’s really the other way around. Anti-racist vigilance has become a gag rule against the French population. French anti-racist organizations are in denial of the Muslim racism that attacks French Jews, in particular. These organizations have joined a jihad against free speech and against truth.
Video footage emerged recently of armed French [Muslim] youths rampaging through the Paris district of Seine-Saint-Denis. Additional footage shows French police in full retreat, disgracing themselves, in the face of youth gangs rioting and leaving a trail of destruction wherever they go.
Muslims, especially young Muslims, are considered to be the country’s new “revolutionary labor class.” It doesn’t matter that for many reasons, some of their own making, most of them are not working and, therefore, are most likely a severe burden to French taxpayers.
Jacques Hamel, the priest who had his throat slit by two Muslims in Normandy, had donated land adjacent to his church to local Muslims to build a mosque, and they had been given use of the parish hall and other facilities during Ramadan. France is learning that kindness to Muslims may be repaid with murder when the kindness is extended to radical Muslims.
At least five of the jihadists who carried out the attacks in Paris and Brussels financed themselves with social welfare payments that totaled more than 50, 000 Euros.
Muslim employees at Air France have repeatedly attempted to sabotage aircraft.
Switzerland: Some may think that Islamic terrorism is reserved for those countries that have participated in operations against ISIS and/or other Muslim terror organizations. But Switzerland has done neither, yet it has been singled out as an enemy in a recent ISIS propaganda video. Huge sums of money from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Turkey are flowing into Switzerland, much of it going to a large network of radically-oriented mosques The Muslim World League is said to be behind it. The Swiss authorities are said to be making a big mistake by not investigating the activities of these mosques.
In November 2016, Swiss police arrested the imam of the an'Nur mosque in Winterthur, in the canton of Zürich, for calling for the murder of Muslims who refuse to participate in communal prayer. The young imam, who had come from Ethiopia, had been in Switzerland for only a short time. The Zurich Federation of Islamic Organizations (Vioz) declared it was "shocked", and suspended the an'Nur mosque from the federation until further notice. But were they really shocked? In 2015, Winterthur made headlines in Switzerland as an emerging center for young Muslims with jihadi ambitions. Four people from Winterthur managed to travel to Syria to join ISIS and a fifth was stopped at the airport in Zürich.
Great Britain: Like most other European nations, Britain is deep in the process of being Islamified. Sharia courts administering Islamic justice in Britain are run by clerics who believe some offenders should have their hands chopped off. “This,” says Muslim scholar, Elham Manea,." Is more backward than [what occurs] in some parts of Pakistan.”
Just days ago, Nadeem Muhammed (43), was in court for trying to fly with a pipe bomb in his hand luggage. He had been boarding a Ryanair flight to Bergamo, Italy when he was held under the UK’s Terrorism Act following a security screening. After telling officers the device had been planted by someone else, he was released and allowed to travel. He flew to Italy and stayed there while tests in the UK revealed that the device he carried was viable, containing enough explosives to cause “serious damage and loss of life” on board a plane. No attempt was made to request Italian police to detain him; nor was it reported that anything had been done by British police to determine who supposedly hid the bomb in Nadeem’s luggage. Could it be the British just didn’t want to cause a scene that might bring a backlash from the country’s Muslims?
More than 100,000 British Muslims sympathize with suicide bombers and people who commit other terrorist acts, according to a 615-page survey. Only one in three British Muslims (34%) would contact the police if they believed that somebody close to them had become involved with radical Islam. In addition, 23% of British Muslims said Islamic Sharia law should replace British law in areas with large Muslim populations.
Belmarsh maximum-security prison in London has become "like a jihadi training camp," according to testimony from a former inmate. The government was accused of burying a report on prison extremism. It warned that the prison’s staff have been reluctant to tackle Islamist behavior for fear of being labeled "racist."
Voter fraud has been deliberately overlooked in Muslim communities because of "political correctness," according to a government report.
Telford, near Birmingham, has been dubbed the Muslim child-sex capital of Britain, where police were accused of covering up allegations that hundreds of children in the town were sexually exploited by Pakistani sex gangs.
Among the key Islam-related issues in Britain during 2016 were Islamic extremism, the continuing spread of Islamic Sharia law in Britain, the sexual exploitation of British children by Muslim gangs, the dismal progress in integrating Muslims into British society, and the failures of British multiculturalism.
Belgium: Between mid-November and mid-December 2016, anti-terror police detained more than 30 people at the Brussels airport on suspicion of “links with terrorism or offences linked to the security of the state.” Thirty suspects in one month equals one potential terrorist captured per day. Terrorists are radicalized in France, go to Syria to fight and when they come back they find the logistical support and the networks they need in Molenbeek, Belgium. It’s like an airbase for jihadists.
Sweden: Just before Christmas last year, a refugee from Syria forced a 13-year-old girl into the bathroom of a school in Northern Sweden. He locked the door and raped her, both vaginally and anally. Afterward, the man threatened the girl with violent reprisals if she would tell anyone. When apprehended, he stated to the police that the “sex was voluntary.” However, a forensic pathologist found that the girl had injuries consistent with her story. Nonetheless, he was acquitted of abuse, as the court said it was unclear what exactly had happened.
The cash Sweden gives to migrants is a lot of money, without their working a single day to earn it. This makes Sweden a paradise for the migrants of the world who don’t want to work. The Swedish taxpayer pays for this.
Recently, the city of Malmö bought 268 apartments, so newly arrived migrants would have a roof over their head. But at the same time, Swedish citizens in Malmö have to wait more than three years in line to rent an apartment. While Swedish taxpayers are forced to fund all these benefits for migrants, the migrants do not have to adapt to the Swedish way of living.
Want more evidence that this Islamic migration jihad—and the crime wave that comes with it—should be blocked at every opportunity by our federal government? Simply click on the Gatestone.org website printed above and discover how, each day, the Islamic caliphate, is becoming a terrifying reality for much of the world.
Warning: If you don’t want this happening here you must contact your congressional representatives repeatedly by telephone, e-mail and also regular mail. They must be made to understand that their future as our elected leaders will end quickly if they don’t act immediately and decisively to protect our financial resources, our freedoms and our very lives.
Liberals promote mob rule in America
For some reason, liberal Democrats think that violent protests all across the country will help them win back Congress and the White House. For some reason, they believe that inciting violent demonstrations (riots) is not a felony violation of federal law. For some reason, Barack Obama’s Organizing for Action, the Clinton Foundation, Black Lives Matter, and the many anti-American organizations funded by George Soros, that are inciting civil unrest, all think they’re too big, too rich and too powerful to be stopped. For one reason, they may all be right; that is if President Trump doesn’t compel the FBI and other federal agencies to do their job, and round up these felons for prosecution.
The invasion of America by illegal aliens, drug traffickers and anarchists has become the Democrats’ weapons of choice in their assault against conservatives and against nearly every word in the United States Constitution. Mob rule is rapidly taking control of the nation. Its immediate goal is to stop, by any means, violent or otherwise, including mayhem and murder, anyone who speaks or stands against their anarchist agenda. Liberals consider their violence not as crimes, but as heroic acts of liberation. They have decided that good is “evil;” and evil is the new “good.”
If President Trump doesn’t act decisively and immediately to put an end to this, his presidency will be reduced to shambles, and the nation will soon cease to exist as a constitutional republic. Americans must not allow themselves to be terrorized so that liberal anarchists can rule the nation. The great classical philosopher, Dante Alighieri, said it best: “The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis.” Silence is a terrible sin of omission; we must speak up to drive out evil wherever it occurs. This is true for Congress, the courts and the president as well as for every citizen of good character.
Is Obama a key figure behind violent anti-Trump protests? Earlier this month, Paul Sperry, a Washington-based investigative journalist and Hoover Institution fellow wrote that “Former president Barack Obama is setting up a “shadow White House” in Washington, DC, for organizing anti-Trump protests nationwide and “rebuilding the ravaged Democrat Party.”
“When former President Barack Obama said he was ‘heartened’ by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House,” Sperry added.
“He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action [ a community organizing project launched by Obama in 2013],” Sperry explained. “Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.”
According to The Blaze website, American novelist Francine Prose wrote in the British newspaper, The Guardian, that “President Donald Trump’s executive order barring immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries…called for more than simple protests. Trump’s actions warrant a general national strike,” she said. The idea has attracted massive support here through the Internet.
Prose who is also a visiting professor of Literature at Bard College, has established an official site for the event calling for a “24-hour occupation of public space in protest of the Trump administration’s refusal to Honor the Constitution of the United States of America.” The strike also has an additional social media presence with a Facebook posting that has gathered 23,000 interested and 14,000 committed to attending. Calls for demonstrators to occupy public space--thereby preventing its use for its intended purpose--are almost never peaceable, turning violent as soon as demonstrators are whipped into a frenzy.
Cities like New York, Chicago, Atlanta, Austin, Portland and Seattle are seeing large crowds gather to shout anti-Trump slogans, shake their fists, provoke fist fights and destroy property. Anarchist events such as those at Berkeley and on the Campus of New York University are but a few of the felony protests sweeping college campuses and municipalities around the nation.
Hundreds of Rutgers University students blocked College Avenue in New Brunswick, N.J., as they protested President-elect Donald Trump last November.
Hundreds in Kalamazoo, Michigan, disrupted traffic chanting "Say it loud and say it clear, refugees are welcome here!" during a recent protest supporting refugee and immigrant rights.
Loud, unruly protesters even flocked to the site of the Houston “Super Bowl LI”, hoping to disrupt the crowds attending the event.
Town Hall meetings conducted by Congressional Republicans such Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), Rod Blum (R- IA) and others have been stopped by paid protestors determined to prevent the right of elected officials to meet with their constituents.
Finally, last Friday, rocks were thrown at President Trump’s limousine as it drove from Palm Beach International Airport to his Mar-a-Lago resort hotel. This is the second time the president’s limousine has been pelted with rocks.
"This is just the beginning," local organizer Chris Schwartz, with the Americans for Democratic Action, said at a protest. "We're going to keep marching and keep rallying." And probably keep throwing rocks.
Why isn’t this riot organizer in Jail? Yvette Felarca is a youngish, middle school teacher in a town somewhere near Los Angeles. She teaches kids a lot like ours and our grandkids. Yvette is also a vicious activist who helped to organize the violent protests at the University of California, Berkeley, earlier this month. She was the subject of a recent TV interview by Fox News’ host Tucker Carlson.
Although government tax dollars pay her salary, Yvette is determined to block our 1st Amendment right to free speech. She is attempting to shut up whomever she deems a "fascist," and she’ll do it in her words “by any means necessary," and that might also include physical harm and even death.
When asked how she defines a fascist, Yvette answered: "It is someone who is committing violence and someone who is trying to organize other people to commit violence." She had no proof that anyone who was speaking to students at Berkeley was promoting violence against any person or group, but she decided that didn’t matter. She was going to commit the very thing she was supposedly demonstrating against—violence and organizing others to commit violence—and she was going to do it against anyone whose ideas she despised.
Those whom Yvette subjectively deems “fascists” she targets through her activist group called “BAMN,” an acronym that suggests the kind of brutal physical punishment she intends to carry out. Hers’ is a clear case of using violence, all in the name of tolerance and equality. Is Yvette Felarca simply a sociopath or is her mindset much darker; that of a psychopath?
But no matter what she might be mentally and emotionally, Yvette’s radical views, when put into action, constitute incitement to riot and doing bodily harm to her ideological opponents. Both of these actions are federal felony crimes. They are also felony crimes under the laws of the state of California. So why haven’t the proper federal and state authorities combined to incarcerate Yvette Felarca and bring an indictment against her for crimes that should merit serious jail time?
Yvette is a violent criminal who should be stopped; that is, if punishment for crime still exists for everyone under our legal and judicial systems. Crime without punishment is anarchy…crime without punishment is chaos that will bring America to ruin.
How much of this violence generated by liberals will it take before opponents rise up against it? How much confrontation of this kind will be enough to spark another civil war that might become as calamitous as the one fought so bitterly 150 years ago? How much of that kind of civil strife will be enough to encourage our powerful enemies overseas to pounce on a weakened, confused and dysfunctional America? Crime without accountability…without punishment…will surely put an end to the greatest republic ever to exist on the face of the Earth. You must not let this happen.
Tea party switches to new operating strategy
Recently I wrote that some tea party groups are disbanding; some due to “burnout”; some due to believing now that Donald Trump is president, their work of promoting good government is done. While I still believe there are fewer local tea party organizations today than before Trump’s election, I was informed by Aileen Milton, president of a large tea party group in The Villages, Florida, that her group has not disbanded but has shifted to a new mode of operating; one that doesn’t hold regularly scheduled membership meetings, but reaches out to members and other conservatives through an expansive set of websites.
Milton operates several websites, led by a “master “site, The Villages Conservative Media: thevillagesconservativemedia.com. It video tapes special events and conducts interviews with international, national and local individuals and groups on a variety of topics and issues facing the nation. It also features links to important news sources, and a comprehensive archive of current and past presentations and interviews. Milton has also worked out a broadband connection with FreedomInAmerica.us where they have a separate channel that uploads her website programs to view on Roku.
Essentially, Milton has replaced traditional membership meetings with a much more convenient and timely access to conservative events, educational presentations, and interviews with guest speakers. The Villages Conservative Media brings the best of a typical tea party meeting right into the home, in a broad range of commentaries, ready and available to anyone who has the time and the desire to be involved in the conservative agenda.
In this age of soaring participation in Internet media, Aileen Milton’s package of informational websites may be the best model for organizations that want to cast the widest possible net of influence on the American people. You can reach The Villages Conservative Media at any one of these sites:
thevillagesconservativemedia.com , firstname.lastname@example.org , email@example.com.
European leaders hide the facts about Muslim crime
It seems that whenever President Trump makes a statement about anything, so-called “fact checkers” in the media run off to prove he lied. It’s time to understand that, as there is fake news, there are also “fake fact checkers.”
Trump commented during his recent Melbourne, Florida rally that something happened in Sweden that shows how Muslim crime is growing there. What Trump got wrong was the date on which a Muslim crime in Sweden had actually happened. He said it was committed the previous day, Friday. But what he meant--and he explained it poorly--was that he learned of an example of Muslin crime in Sweden from a Friday news story that appeared on Tucker Carlson’s Fox News show.
While Trump had the date wrong, he could have mentioned any day in Sweden in the last decade or more. The truth is that major crimes in Sweden, attributable to immigrants have soared to the point of being nearly out of control. Over the past 10-15 years, immigrants have mainly come to Sweden from Muslim countries such as Iraq, Syria and Somalia.
The Gatestone Institute reports that forty years after the Swedish parliament decided that Sweden would become a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. This report doesn’t discuss the background of the perpetrators of these crimes, but second-generation immigrants are classified as ordinary Swedes.
According to The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, during 2011, 29,000 Swedish women reported that they had been raped. So who-- by no stretch of the imagination-- raped most of them?
Back in 1975, the year when Sweden become multicultural, its population stood at 8,208,442. By 2014 it had grown to 9,743,087 -- an increase of 18.7%. Gatestone notes “This growth is [nearly] entirely due to immigration.”
The link between immigrants and Swedish crime. Is there a link between the incidence of rape and the number of people with a foreign background in Sweden? Gatestone states the facts point to “yes.” A 1996 report, again by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention, concluded that immigrants from Iraq, Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia were are up to 19 times more likely to commit rape than ethnic Swedes.
Since 2000, there has only been one research report on immigrant crime. It was done in 2006 by Karlstads University. It showed that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape were foreign-born or second-generation immigrants.
Perhaps most frightening of all are gang rapes. Gatestone advises that gang rape “has reached Sweden with full force over the past few decades.” It was virtually unknown before in Swedish criminal history. “The number of gang rapes increased spectacularly between 1995 and 2006.” Since then no studies of this crime have been undertaken.
In Sweden, the authorities “do what they can to conceal the origin of the rapists.” They do the same, for those involved all other crimes in Sweden, even lying about them to the foreign press. A recent example occurred when, shortly after Trump’s statement about Sweden, authorities tried to hide that Swedish police had to fire live ammunition at mobs of masked rioters who hurled stones at them in the migrant-dominated Stockholm district of Rinkeby. The vicious attacks in this neighborhood followed the attempted arrest of a wanted criminal. Only eight days earlier, similar rioting occurred in Rinkeby.
So when the Swedish government says crime there hasn’t increased significantly since last year, they’re obscuring the truth that immigrant crime has been sky-high for years and years. Trump was right about Sweden.
Targeted incarceration a sure cure for sanctuary cities
Sanctuary cities are a severe handicap in protecting Americans from terrorist threats. Their perils have also been extended to impact entire counties and even some states. These geographic entities basically refuse to identify and arrest undocumented migrants, and known criminal aliens, who hide there protected from the law, often while committing vicious crimes including murder, rape, child abuse and armed robbery.
President Trump intends to end these sanctuaries for criminals by refusing to give them federal funds needed to support essential public services. Trump knows how vital federal funds are to residents of these illegal sanctuaries, and believes that withholding them will provide sufficient incentive for mayors, county administrators and governors to obey federal immigration law.
Interruptions in the flow of these funds is a powerful reason for not violating the law. But when implemented, honest law-abiding citizens are punished even more than the criminal aliens who hide among them.
In some cases, the threat of withholding federal funds may be sufficient to compel municipalities to end their sanctuary status. However, there might be many that will still refuse to obey immigration law in spite of being cut off from federal money. In such cases, something else, a tougher punishment, must be held over the heads of those who won’t give in to immigration law.
It’s time to use legal action against government officials who will not abide by, and therefore violate, federal law. They should be subject to arrest, trial and possible jail time. Government officials, contrary to the mistaken opinion of some of them like Chicago’s, Rahm Emanuel, are not above the law. Just like you and me, they must pay for their crimes. If I embezzle money from by employer…if I start counterfeiting $100 bills…if I do harm to my neighbor…I’m a law breaker and I deserve arrest, trial and punishment. So, in every sense, do government officials who break the law.
Some might argue that incarceration targeted to officials who flout our immigration policy is an abuse of the law, and that jail time is far too severe a punishment. I disagree, they are, after all, law breakers and deserve personal punishment. If not incarceration, then at least make their crimes punishable by forfeiture of significant personal wealth and property.
If I ‘m charged with income tax evasion, the IRS will pursue me not only for payment, but can and will impose penalties and fines and can confiscate my home, my savings and anything of value that I own. The IRS can even put me in jail. The same array of punishments should be able to be imposed upon officials who refuse to terminate sanctuary status in the entities they administer.
For each and every one of us, the law is the law; we either live by it or suffer the consequences.
"Trump Christmas parody enrages Liberals."
Patriots who voted Donald Trump into office as our 45th president are giddy over his big win. And a new hilarious Christmas parody explains the merriment they feel. Click on the link here for a good holiday laugh. Liberals who "just don't get it" are burning with anger because they couldn't be the "Grinches" who stole the election.
U.S. liberals flee to Canada
This story appeared out of nowhere, and can’t be substantiated. But all of us who voted for Donald Trump hope it turns out to be true:
The flood of Trump-fearing American liberals sneaking across the border into Canada has intensified in the past week. The Republican presidential campaign is prompting an exodus among left-leaning Americans who fear they'll soon be required to hunt, pray, pay taxes, obey the law, and live according to the U.S. Constitution.
Canadian border residents say it's not uncommon to see dozens of sociology professors, liberal arts majors, global-warming activists, pampered athletes, movie stars, and "green" energy proponents crossing their fields at night.
"I went out to milk the cows the other day, and there was a Hollywood producer huddled in the barn," said southern Manitoba farmer Red Greenfield, whose acreage borders North Dakota. "He was cold, exhausted and hungry, and begged me for a latte and some free-range chicken. When I said I didn't have any, he left before I even got a chance to show him my screenplay."
In an effort to stop the illegal aliens, Greenfield erected higher fences, but the liberals scaled them. He then installed loudspeakers that blared Rush Limbaugh across the fields, but they just stuck their fingers in their ears and kept coming. Officials are particularly concerned about smugglers who meet liberals just south of the border, pack them into electric cars, and drive them across the border, where they are simply left to fend for themselves after the battery dies.
"A lot of these people are not prepared for our rugged conditions," an Alberta border patrolman said. "I found one carload without a single bottle of Perrier water, or any gemelli with shrimp and arugula. All they had was a nice little Napa Valley cabernet and some kale chips.” When liberals are caught, they're sent back across the border, often wailing that they fear persecution from “Trump troopers.”
Rumors are circulating about plans being made to build re-education camps where liberals will be forced to drink domestic beer, study the Constitution, and find jobs that actually contribute to the economy.
In recent days, liberals have turned to ingenious ways of crossing the border. Some have been disguised as senior citizens taking a bus trip to buy cheap Canadian prescription drugs. After catching a half-dozen young vegans in blue-hair wig disguises, Canadian immigration authorities began stopping buses and quizzing the supposed senior citizens about Perry Como and Rosemary Clooney to prove that they were alive in the '50s. "If they can't identify the accordion player on The Lawrence Welk Show, we become very suspicious about their age," an official said.
Canadian citizens have complained that the illegal immigrants are creating an organic-broccoli shortage, are buying up all the Barbara Streisand CD's, and are overloading the internet while downloading jazzercise apps to their cell phones.
"I really feel sorry for American liberals, but the Canadian economy just can't support them," an Ottawa resident said. "After all, how many art-history majors does one country need?”